On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 12:30:16PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2026, Chaitanya Kumar Borah <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> > mst_stream_compute_config() called intel_pfit_compute_config() twice
> > in a row. Probably because of a bad merge. Drop the redundant duplicate
> > call.
> >
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Nemesa Garg <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> > Fixes: 5ce9ac1531b8 ("drm/i915/mst: Call intel_pfit_compute_config() for 
> > sharpness filter")
> 
> Rodrigo, by the looks of it, this was an unnecessary cherry-pick for
> fixes. The context for 5ce9ac1531b8 shows the existing call, so I don't
> think this is a merge failure. But why it happened, no idea!

Indeed weird, I should had caught that on the fixes, I'm sorry.

but it is weird anyway, looking to
d4686f34bbeb ("drm/i915/pfit: Call intel_pfit_compute_config() unconditionally 
on (e)DP/HDMI")

which is the mentioned fixed patch, it actually introduces this chunck.
Then the fix patch introduces this again.

So, it looks like this also occurred on the drm-intel-next first anyway?

Ville, thoughts?

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 4 ----
> >  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > index 3be1643f8d03..57daed0b0b36 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > @@ -761,10 +761,6 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_config(struct 
> > intel_atomic_state *state,
> >     pipe_config->sink_format = INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB;
> >     pipe_config->output_format = INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB;
> >  
> > -   ret = intel_pfit_compute_config(pipe_config, conn_state);
> > -   if (ret)
> > -           return ret;
> > -
> >     ret = intel_pfit_compute_config(pipe_config, conn_state);
> >     if (ret)
> >             return ret;
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel

Reply via email to