On 15.05.2014 10:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:13:01AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2014, Knut Petersen <knut_peter...@t-online.de> wrote:
On 13.05.2014 22:24, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2014 16:50:12 +0100
Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 04:07:37PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
This matches the algorithm used by earlier kernels when selecting the
mode for the fbcon. And only if there is no modes at all, do we fall
back to using the BIOS configuration. Seamless transition is still
preserved (from the BIOS configuration to ours) so long as the BIOS has
also chosen what we hope is the native configuration.

Reported-by: Knut Petersen <knut_peter...@t-online.de>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78655
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
I don't think that Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org is necessary, kernels up
to 3.14.x don't expose the problem. And as this fixes a post-3.14
regression this is a clear candidate for 3.15
Chris, do we drop cc: stable?
The switch-over was in 3.15, then yes the regression is only limited to
3.15
-Chris

Still missing in git master ...

cu,
 Knut
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to