Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] drm/i915/dp: intel_dp_joiner_valid_primary_pipe_mask() allows
  4-pipe eDP joiner
--

commit fe84695283ce600e9fd16b2acfa62f5dd071d260
Author: Mika Kahola <[email protected]>

drm/i915/display: Limit the eDP joiner to the pipe A and B pair

This commit adds intel_dp_joiner_valid_primary_pipe_mask() to restrict
joined eDP configurations to primary pipe A during mode validation and
link configuration.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index ef164a7976187..b359a66a018f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1362,16 +1362,27 @@ static int intel_dp_mso_pixel_clock(struct intel_dp 
> *intel_dp, int pixel_clock)
>       return pixel_clock / intel_dp->mso_link_count;
>  }
>  
> +/* eDP can only be joined as the pipe A and B pair. */
> +static u8 intel_dp_joiner_valid_primary_pipe_mask(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +                                               int num_joined_pipes)
> +{
> +     struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> +     u8 pipe_mask = intel_joiner_valid_primary_pipe_mask(display, 
> num_joined_pipes);
> +
> +     if (num_joined_pipes > 1 && intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> +             pipe_mask &= BIT(PIPE_A);
> +
> +     return pipe_mask;
> +}

[Severity: Medium]
Does intel_dp_joiner_valid_primary_pipe_mask() still allow 4-pipe
ultrajoiner (pipes A, B, C, and D) on eDP when num_joined_pipes == 4?

On platforms with HAS_ULTRAJOINER(display),
intel_joiner_valid_primary_pipe_mask(display, 4) returns BIT(PIPE_A)
because pipe A is the primary pipe for joining 4 consecutive pipes.
Masking pipe_mask with BIT(PIPE_A) when num_joined_pipes > 1 leaves
BIT(PIPE_A) set for num_joined_pipes == 4 instead of rejecting
num_joined_pipes > 2, so intel_dp_can_join() and
intel_dp_compute_link_config() on pipe A can still select a 4-pipe
joiner configuration (crtc_state->joiner_pipes = GENMASK(3, 0)).

Also, on DISPLAY_VER(display) == 11 where intel_dp_has_joiner() allows
non-PORT_A encoders and joiner_pipes() in intel_display.c only permits
BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_C), masking with BIT(PIPE_A) rejects PIPE_B while
leaving PIPE_A to fail later in intel_atomic_check_joiner().
Additionally, i915_joiner_write() in intel_display_debugfs.c still
validates force_joined_pipes against
intel_joiner_valid_primary_pipe_mask() directly.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · 
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1

Reply via email to