On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 12:01:24PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> Doing otherwise breaks listing the subtests. The test was throwing an
> error out when universal planes were disabled as well because of that.
>
> Cc: Matt Roper <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <[email protected]>
> ---
> tests/kms_universal_plane.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_universal_plane.c b/tests/kms_universal_plane.c
> index fe0fde3..c64cdbb 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_universal_plane.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_universal_plane.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ functional_test_pipe(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe,
> igt_output_t *output)
> int num_primary = 0, num_cursor = 0;
> int i;
>
> + igt_assert(data->display.has_universal_planes);
Shouldn't this be an igt_require instead? In any case moving this into
subtests is correct.
-Daniel
> igt_skip_on(pipe >= display->n_pipes);
>
> fprintf(stdout, "Testing connector %s using pipe %c\n",
> @@ -535,8 +536,6 @@ run_tests_for_pipe(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe)
> {
> igt_output_t *output;
>
> - igt_assert(data->display.has_universal_planes);
> -
> igt_subtest_f("universal-plane-pipe-%c-functional", pipe_name(pipe))
> for_each_connected_output(&data->display, output)
> functional_test_pipe(data, pipe, output);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
