On 30.07.2014 18:25, Daniel Vetter wrote: > As usual in both a crtc index and a struct drm_crtc * version. > > The function assumes that no one drivers their display below 10Hz, and > it will complain if the vblank wait takes longer than that. > > v2: Also check dev->max_vblank_counter since some drivers register a > fake get_vblank_counter function. > > v3: Use drm_vblank_count instead of calling the low-level > ->get_vblank_counter callback. That way we'll get the sw-cooked > counter for platforms without proper vblank support and so can ditch > the max_vblank_counter check again. > > v4: Review from Michel Dänzer: > - Restore lost notes about v3: > - Spelling in kerneldoc. > - Inline wait_event condition. > - s/vblank_wait/wait_one_vblank/ > > Cc: Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com> -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
