On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:49:07PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > Be sure to always flush a stuck pageflip even if we couldn't possibly > > expect one to be there. > > > > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82612 > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 12 +++++------- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > index a7582a46e82e..5898e7157c4c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > @@ -3359,11 +3359,7 @@ void intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips(struct > > drm_crtc *crtc) > > struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > > > - if (crtc->primary->fb == NULL) > > - return; > > - > > WARN_ON(waitqueue_active(&dev_priv->pending_flip_queue)); > > - > > if (WARN_ON(wait_event_timeout(dev_priv->pending_flip_queue, > > !intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(crtc), > > 60*HZ) == 0)) { > > @@ -3378,9 +3374,11 @@ void intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips(struct > > drm_crtc *crtc) > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags); > > } > > Chris, the patch context has changed above, in fact I can't find such > context anywhere. Is the patch otherwise valid against current -fixes?
Until we have confirmation that it fixes a real bug I don't think this is material for -fixes. Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
