On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:17:00AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
>
> Write and reads following the block changed use engine specific use counters
> and unless that is matched here force wake use counting goes bad. Same
> force wake is attempted to be taken twice which leads to at least time outs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Is it worth a v2 to have gen >= 9 here?
--
Damien
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 3048d78..4b33767 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ static void execlists_elsp_write(struct intel_engine_cs
> *ring,
> * Instead, we do the runtime_pm_get/put when creating/destroying
> requests.
> */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, flags);
> - if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv->dev)) {
> + if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv->dev) || IS_GEN9(dev_priv->dev)) {
> if (dev_priv->uncore.fw_rendercount++ == 0)
> dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv,
> FORCEWAKE_RENDER);
> @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static void execlists_elsp_write(struct intel_engine_cs
> *ring,
>
> /* Release Force Wakeup (see the big comment above). */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, flags);
> - if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv->dev)) {
> + if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv->dev) || IS_GEN9(dev_priv->dev)) {
> if (--dev_priv->uncore.fw_rendercount == 0)
> dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_put(dev_priv,
> FORCEWAKE_RENDER);
> --
> 2.1.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
