I didn't notice this on the machine I developed it since the original wait testcase fails there. Oops.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> --- tests/gem_wait.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/gem_wait.c b/tests/gem_wait.c index 83ddb97216ab..1320c7b91a9e 100644 --- a/tests/gem_wait.c +++ b/tests/gem_wait.c @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void render_timeout(int fd) if (timeout == (ENOUGH_WORK_IN_SECONDS * NSEC_PER_SEC)) igt_info("Buffer was already done!\n"); else { - igt_info("Finished with %lu time remaining\n", timeout); + igt_info("Finished with %llu time remaining\n", timeout); } /* check that polling with timeout=0 works. */ @@ -212,8 +212,6 @@ static void render_timeout(int fd) drm_intel_bo_unreference(dst); intel_batchbuffer_free(batch); drm_intel_bufmgr_destroy(bufmgr); - - close(fd); } static void invalid_flags(int fd) -- 1.9.3 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
