On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:00:30PM +0530, Singh, Gaurav K wrote:
>
> On 9/24/2014 2:57 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.si...@intel.com> wrote:
> >>Signed-off-by: Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.si...@intel.com>
> >>Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.ku...@intel.com>
> >>---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 53
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h | 1 +
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c | 1 +
> >> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >>b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >>index ad8179b..922d807 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >>@@ -6215,6 +6215,7 @@ enum punit_power_well {
> >> #define DPI_ENABLE (1 << 31) /* A
> >> + B */
> >> #define MIPIA_MIPI4DPHY_DELAY_COUNT_SHIFT 27
> >> #define MIPIA_MIPI4DPHY_DELAY_COUNT_MASK (0xf << 27)
> >>+#define DUAL_LINK_MODE_SHIFT 26
> >> #define DUAL_LINK_MODE_MASK (1 << 26)
> >> #define DUAL_LINK_MODE_FRONT_BACK (0 << 26)
> >> #define DUAL_LINK_MODE_PIXEL_ALTERNATIVE (1 << 26)
> >>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> >>b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> >>index e456ca9..3b1890e 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> >>@@ -109,13 +109,31 @@ static void intel_dsi_port_enable(struct
> >>intel_encoder *encoder)
> >> struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
> >> struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> >> enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> >>- u32 temp;
> >>-
> >>- /* assert ip_tg_enable signal */
> >>- temp = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(pipe)) & ~LANE_CONFIGURATION_MASK;
> >>- temp = temp | intel_dsi->port_bits;
> >>- I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(pipe), temp | DPI_ENABLE);
> >>- POSTING_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(pipe));
> >>+ u32 temp, port_control = 0;
> >>+
> >>+ if (intel_dsi->dual_link) {
> >>+ port_control = (intel_dsi->dual_link - 1)
> >>+ << DUAL_LINK_MODE_SHIFT;
> >>+ port_control |= pipe ? LANE_CONFIGURATION_DUAL_LINK_B :
> >>+ LANE_CONFIGURATION_DUAL_LINK_A;
> >>+ /*For Port A */
> >>+ temp = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(0));
> >>+ temp = temp | port_control;
> >>+ I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(0), temp | DPI_ENABLE);
> >>+ POSTING_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(0));
> >>+
> >>+ /* For Port C */
> >>+ temp = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(1));
> >>+ I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(1), temp | DPI_ENABLE);
> >>+ POSTING_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(1));
> >This calls for a cleanup in i915_reg.h for per port vs. per transcoder
> >registers. MIPI_PORT_CTRL(1) uses _TRANSCODER macro. We also have enum
> >port with PORT_C == 2. This gets confusing.
>
> Are you suggesting to use _PORT macro instead of _TRANSCODER macro?
I think so, and given that we already have some offenders the existing
code should be converted with a prep patch first.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
