On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:32:23PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Regression from: > > > > commit be4710a541b517b5f8663448bffed5656d59b47b > > Author: Thomas Wood <thomas.w...@intel.com> > > Date: Fri Oct 10 11:20:35 2014 +0100 > > > > lib: add common min and max macros > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85218 > > Tested-by: Guo Jinxian <jinxianx....@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com> > > Push it already!
To clarify igt process: If you're patch has been sitting on the m-l for a day or so without objection, just push it. If it's critical (like this one) and you're confident it's good push right after sending. Submitting to intel-gfx for igt patches is mostly so that other people can watch what flies by and drop suggestions for later improvements. And of course new contributors get the full review treatment to make sure they use all the nice stuff the testsuite provides properly. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
