On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:51:34PM +0100, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > From: Gustavo Padovan <[email protected]> > > There is no point in flipping a buffer for a disabled crtc.
That thing doesn't actually flip but just signal the frontbuffer tracking code that either has just flipped or is going to real soon now (tm). But yeah, still makes no sense when the entire pipe is off, so: Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 8530401..9a913f5 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -8544,9 +8544,9 @@ static int intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj(struct drm_crtc > *crtc, > if (old_width != width) > intel_update_watermarks(crtc); > intel_crtc_update_cursor(crtc, intel_crtc->cursor_bo != NULL); > - } > > - intel_frontbuffer_flip(dev, INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_CURSOR(pipe)); > + intel_frontbuffer_flip(dev, INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_CURSOR(pipe)); > + } > > return 0; > fail_unpin: > -- > 1.9.3 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
