On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 05:33:24PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> When playing around with debugfs and a HSW machine I noticed that we
> were displaying some garbled value in i915_ddb_info. This debugfs file
> is only meaningful for gen9+, so don't display anything on earlier
> platforms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 6c16939..d0e445e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2743,6 +2743,9 @@ static int i915_ddb_info(struct seq_file *m, void 
> *unused)
>       enum pipe pipe;
>       int plane;
>  
> +     if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 9)
> +             return 0;

-ENODEV or somesuch? But I guess we're not too consistent how we deal
with such things, so seems OK as is too:

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

> +
>       drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
>  
>       ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb;
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to