Hi Julia,

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote:
> These patches replace what appears to be a reference to the name of the
> current function but is misspelled in some way by either the name of the
> function itself, or by %s and then __func__ in an argument list.

Would there be any value in doing this for _all_ cases where the
function name is written in a format string?

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: [email protected]
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to