On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Kumar Amit Mehta <gmate.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The comment for intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler() is not consistent
> with the code and the rest of the comment for this routine. This patch
> fixes this typo in comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Amit Mehta <gmate.a...@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>


> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
> index 77af512..04e248d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
> @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ bool intel_set_pch_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * intel_pch_fifo_underrun_irq_handler - handle PCH fifo underrun interrupt
> + * intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler - handle CPU fifo underrun interrupt
>   * @dev_priv: i915 device instance
>   * @pipe: (CPU) pipe to set state for
>   *
> -- 
> 2.1.0
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to