On 02/09/2015 06:03 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Currently we don't support anything but X tiled. And for an easier
transition it makes a lot of sense to just keep requiring that X tiled
is properly fenced.

Which means we need to do absolutely nothing in old code to support fb
modifiers, yay!

Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 3fe95982be93..2d69cce03ab5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -12707,7 +12707,20 @@ static int intel_framebuffer_init(struct drm_device 
*dev,

        WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev->struct_mutex));

-       if (obj->tiling_mode == I915_TILING_Y) {
+       if (mode_cmd->flags & DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS) {
+               /* Enforce that fb modifier and tiling mode match, but only for
+                * X-tiled. */
+               if (!!(obj->tiling_mode == I915_TILING_X) !=
+                   !!(mode_cmd->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED)) {
+                       DRM_DEBUG("tiling_mode doesn't match fb modifier\n");
+                       return -EINVAL;
+               }
+       } else {
+               if (obj->tiling_mode == I915_TILING_X)
+                       mode_cmd->modifier[0] = I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED;
+       }
+
+       if (mode_cmd->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED) {
                DRM_DEBUG("hardware does not support tiling Y\n");
                return -EINVAL;

== I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED, although it can't really happen with these changes. But don't we still need the check against obj->tiling_mode for Y?

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to