On 02/26/2015 04:59 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 04:47:23PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Display watermarks need different programming for different tiling
modes.
Set the relevant flag so this happens during the plane commit and
add relevant data into a structure made available to the watermark
computation code.
v2: Pass in tiling info to sprite plane updates as well.
v3: Rebased for plane handling changes.
v4: Handle fb == NULL when plane is disabled.
v5: Refactored for addfb2 interface.
v6: Refactored for fb modifier changes.
v7: Updated for atomic commit by only updating watermarks when tiling changes.
v8: BSpec watermark calculation updates.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Matt Roper <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 6 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 6 ++++
4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 626e6538..1d50934 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -11994,6 +11994,12 @@ intel_check_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_PRIMARY(intel_crtc->pipe);
intel_crtc->atomic.update_fbc = true;
+
+ /* Update watermarks on tiling changes. */
+ if (!plane->state->fb || !state->base.fb ||
+ plane->state->fb->modifier[0] !=
+ state->base.fb->modifier[0])
+ intel_crtc->atomic.update_wm = true;
}
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 399d2b2..b124548 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -501,6 +501,7 @@ struct intel_plane_wm_parameters {
uint8_t bytes_per_pixel;
bool enabled;
bool scaled;
+ u64 tiling;
};
struct intel_plane {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 626c3c2..e0d6ebc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2603,7 +2603,7 @@ static uint32_t skl_wm_method1(uint32_t pixel_rate,
uint8_t bytes_per_pixel,
static uint32_t skl_wm_method2(uint32_t pixel_rate, uint32_t pipe_htotal,
uint32_t horiz_pixels, uint8_t bytes_per_pixel,
- uint32_t latency)
+ uint64_t tiling, uint32_t latency)
{
Hum, does this compile? I'm seeing an extra argument to skl_wm_method2()
but no update at the calling site?
Not only that, but it even works! :) (Extra argument is there, you must
have missed it!)
uint32_t ret;
uint32_t plane_bytes_per_line, plane_blocks_per_line;
@@ -2613,7 +2613,16 @@ static uint32_t skl_wm_method2(uint32_t pixel_rate,
uint32_t pipe_htotal,
return UINT_MAX;
plane_bytes_per_line = horiz_pixels * bytes_per_pixel;
- plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
+
+ if (tiling == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
+ tiling == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
+ plane_bytes_per_line *= 4;
+ plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
+ plane_blocks_per_line /= 4;
+ } else {
+ plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
+ }
+
wm_intermediate_val = latency * pixel_rate;
ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(wm_intermediate_val, pipe_htotal * 1000) *
plane_blocks_per_line;
@@ -2665,6 +2674,7 @@ static void skl_compute_wm_pipe_parameters(struct
drm_crtc *crtc,
struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
struct drm_plane *plane;
+ struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
int i = 1; /* Index for sprite planes start */
p->active = intel_crtc_active(crtc);
@@ -2680,6 +2690,14 @@ static void skl_compute_wm_pipe_parameters(struct
drm_crtc *crtc,
crtc->primary->fb->bits_per_pixel / 8;
p->plane[0].horiz_pixels = intel_crtc->config->pipe_src_w;
p->plane[0].vert_pixels = intel_crtc->config->pipe_src_h;
+ p->plane[0].tiling = DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE;
+ fb = crtc->primary->fb;
+ /*
+ * Framebuffer can be NULL on plane disable, but it does not
+ * matter for watermarks if we assume no tiling in that case.
+ */
+ if (fb)
+ p->plane[0].tiling = fb->modifier[0];
p->cursor.enabled = true;
p->cursor.bytes_per_pixel = 4;
@@ -2709,6 +2727,7 @@ static bool skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
uint32_t plane_bytes_per_line, plane_blocks_per_line;
uint32_t res_blocks, res_lines;
uint32_t result_blocks;
+ uint32_t y_tile_minimum;
The scope of the y_tile_minimum variable could be restricted further,
but well...
Okay, okay, I'm in the old C standard for kernel still.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
