On 19/02/2015 17:17, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
From: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>Updated a couple of trace points to use the now cached request pointer rather than extracting it from the ring. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index 10462f6..883cabd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission(struct i915_execbuffer_params *params, return ret; } - trace_i915_gem_ring_dispatch(intel_ring_get_request(ring), params->dispatch_flags); + trace_i915_gem_ring_dispatch(params->request, params->dispatch_flags); i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_active(vmas, ring); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c index c3c783f..c42af08 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ int intel_execlists_submission(struct i915_execbuffer_params *params, if (ret) return ret; - trace_i915_gem_ring_dispatch(intel_ring_get_request(ring), params->dispatch_flags); + trace_i915_gem_ring_dispatch(params->request, params->dispatch_flags); i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_active(vmas, ring);
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas....@intel.com> Thanks, Tomas _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
