On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:52:56PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 01:21:34PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 03:07:59PM +0530, Vijay Purushothaman wrote:
> > > As per the recommendation from PHY team, limit the max vco supported in
> > > CHV to 6.48 GHz
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vijay Purushothaman <vijay.a.purushotha...@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > index 3b0fe9f..4e710f6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static const intel_limit_t intel_limits_chv = {
> > > * them would make no difference.
> > > */
> > > .dot = { .min = 25000 * 5, .max = 540000 * 5},
> > > - .vco = { .min = 4860000, .max = 6700000 },
> > > + .vco = { .min = 4860000, .max = 6480000 },
> >
> > I have a patch here to reduce the minimum to 4.80 GHz, otherwise I can't
> > get my 2560x1440 HDMI display working (241.5 MHz clock). With that change
> > we still have a gap (233-240 MHz) in the frequencies we can produce.
> > Reducing the max to 6.48 GHz will increase that gap to 216-240 MHz, which
> > is a bit unfortunate. But if that's the recommendation we should follow
> > it I suppose, and hope no HDMI displays will want such frequencies.
> >
> > Is there an updated spreadsheet available with the new limits? Quite a
> > few of the frequencies in the original spreadsheet did have vco>6.48
> > GHz.
> >
> > I any case this seems OK, so
> > Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> This one doesn't apply any more ... still needed?
Supposedly, yes.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
