On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 17:01 +0100, Nick Hoath wrote: > On 29/04/2015 14:02, Deak, Imre wrote: > > On pe, 2015-04-10 at 13:12 +0100, Nick Hoath wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.ho...@intel.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 5 +++++ > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > >> index eebee73..cc62e5c 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > >> @@ -1054,6 +1054,10 @@ static int bxt_init_workarounds(struct > >> intel_engine_cs *ring) > >> GEN7_SBE_SS_CACHE_DISPATCH_PORT_SHARING_DISABLE); > >> } > >> > >> + /* WaForceContextSaveRestoreNonCoherent:bxt */ > >> + WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, > >> + HDC_FORCE_CONTEXT_SAVE_RESTORE_NON_COHERENT); > >> + > > > > Looks ok, but again it needs to be added for SKL (all steppings) in > > gen9_init_workarounds. > > The same argument as for patch 2/3 applies?
Yes, applying this on SKL as a follow up is ok: Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
