On 5/6/2015 8:35 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2015, Vandana Kannan <vandana.kan...@intel.com> wrote:
Changes based on future platform readiness patches related to
HAS_PCH_SPLIT(). Use HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY() instead of HAS_PCH_SPLIT.
This needs an update to reflect the patch.
BXT does not have PP_DIV register. Making changes to handle this.
Second set of PPS registers have been defined but will be used when VBT
provides a selection between the 2 sets of registers.
v2:
[Jani] Added 2nd set of PPS registers and the macro
Jani's review comments
- remove reference in i915_suspend.c
- Use BXT PP macro
Squashing all PPS related patches into one.
Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kan...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: A.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kam...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 13 ++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 36805b6..e8d93ea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -6315,6 +6315,8 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
#define PCH_PP_CONTROL 0xc7204
#define PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS (0xabcd << 16)
#define PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK (0xffff << 16)
+#define BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK (0x1f0)
+#define BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT 4
#define EDP_FORCE_VDD (1 << 3)
#define EDP_BLC_ENABLE (1 << 2)
#define PANEL_POWER_RESET (1 << 1)
@@ -6343,6 +6345,17 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
#define PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK (0x1f)
#define PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT 0
+/* BXT PPS changes - 2nd set of PPS registers */
+#define _BXT_PP_STATUS2 0xc7300
+#define _BXT_PP_CONTROL2 0xc7304
+#define _BXT_PP_ON_DELAYS2 0xc7308
+#define _BXT_PP_OFF_DELAYS2 0xc730c
+
+#define BXT_PP_STATUS(n) ((!n) ? PCH_PP_STATUS : _BXT_PP_STATUS2)
+#define BXT_PP_CONTROL(n) ((!n) ? PCH_PP_CONTROL : _BXT_PP_CONTROL2)
+#define BXT_PP_ON_DELAYS(n) ((!n) ? PCH_PP_ON_DELAYS : _BXT_PP_ON_DELAYS2)
+#define BXT_PP_OFF_DELAYS(n) ((!n) ? PCH_PP_OFF_DELAYS : _BXT_PP_OFF_DELAYS2)
+
#define PCH_DP_B 0xe4100
#define PCH_DPB_AUX_CH_CTL 0xe4110
#define PCH_DPB_AUX_CH_DATA1 0xe4114
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 937ba31..fd91006 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -559,7 +559,9 @@ static u32 _pp_ctrl_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
- if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev))
+ return BXT_PP_CONTROL(0);
+ else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
return PCH_PP_CONTROL;
else
return VLV_PIPE_PP_CONTROL(vlv_power_sequencer_pipe(intel_dp));
@@ -569,7 +571,9 @@ static u32 _pp_stat_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
- if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev))
+ return BXT_PP_STATUS(0);
+ else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
return PCH_PP_STATUS;
else
return VLV_PIPE_PP_STATUS(vlv_power_sequencer_pipe(intel_dp));
@@ -4954,8 +4958,8 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct drm_device
*dev,
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct edp_power_seq cur, vbt, spec,
*final = &intel_dp->pps_delays;
- u32 pp_on, pp_off, pp_div, pp;
- int pp_ctrl_reg, pp_on_reg, pp_off_reg, pp_div_reg;
+ u32 pp_on, pp_off, pp_div = 0, pp_ctl = 0, pp;
+ int pp_ctrl_reg, pp_on_reg, pp_off_reg, pp_div_reg = 0;
Note that pp is actually used for pp_ctl. You can rename that if you
want.
Ok.
lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->pps_mutex);
@@ -4963,7 +4967,16 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct drm_device
*dev,
if (final->t11_t12 != 0)
return;
- if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
+ /*
+ * TODO: BXT has 2 sets of PPS registers.
+ * Correct Register for Broxton need to be identified
+ * using VBT. hardcoding for now
+ */
+ pp_ctrl_reg = BXT_PP_CONTROL(0);
+ pp_on_reg = BXT_PP_ON_DELAYS(0);
+ pp_off_reg = BXT_PP_OFF_DELAYS(0);
+ } else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
pp_ctrl_reg = PCH_PP_CONTROL;
pp_on_reg = PCH_PP_ON_DELAYS;
pp_off_reg = PCH_PP_OFF_DELAYS;
@@ -4984,7 +4997,10 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct drm_device
*dev,
pp_on = I915_READ(pp_on_reg);
pp_off = I915_READ(pp_off_reg);
- pp_div = I915_READ(pp_div_reg);
+ if (!IS_BROXTON(dev))
+ pp_div = I915_READ(pp_div_reg);
+ else
+ pp_ctl = I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg);
You already have pp_ctl in pp at this point. It is read using
ironlake_get_pp_control, which also needs an update for bxt, as AFAICT
panel unlock is no longer needed and MBZ.
Ok.
/* Pull timing values out of registers */
cur.t1_t3 = (pp_on & PANEL_POWER_UP_DELAY_MASK) >>
@@ -4999,7 +5015,11 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct drm_device
*dev,
cur.t10 = (pp_off & PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_MASK) >>
PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT;
- cur.t11_t12 = ((pp_div & PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev))
+ cur.t11_t12 = (((pp_ctl & BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
+ BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT) - 1) * 1000;
+ else
+ cur.t11_t12 = ((pp_div & PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT) * 1000;
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("cur t1_t3 %d t8 %d t9 %d t10 %d t11_t12 %d\n",
@@ -5057,13 +5077,23 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct
drm_device *dev,
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
u32 pp_on, pp_off, pp_div, port_sel = 0;
int div = HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev) ? intel_pch_rawclk(dev) :
intel_hrawclk(dev);
- int pp_on_reg, pp_off_reg, pp_div_reg;
+ int pp_on_reg, pp_off_reg, pp_div_reg = 0, pp_ctrl_reg;
enum port port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->port;
const struct edp_power_seq *seq = &intel_dp->pps_delays;
lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->pps_mutex);
- if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
+ /*
+ * TODO: BXT has 2 sets of PPS registers.
+ * Correct Register for Broxton need to be identified
+ * using VBT. hardcoding for now
+ */
+ pp_ctrl_reg = BXT_PP_CONTROL(0);
+ pp_on_reg = BXT_PP_ON_DELAYS(0);
+ pp_off_reg = BXT_PP_OFF_DELAYS(0);
+
+ } else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
pp_on_reg = PCH_PP_ON_DELAYS;
pp_off_reg = PCH_PP_OFF_DELAYS;
pp_div_reg = PCH_PP_DIVISOR;
@@ -5089,9 +5119,16 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct
drm_device *dev,
(seq->t10 << PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT);
/* Compute the divisor for the pp clock, simply match the Bspec
* formula. */
- pp_div = ((100 * div)/2 - 1) << PP_REFERENCE_DIVIDER_SHIFT;
- pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12, 1000)
- << PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT);
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
+ pp_div = I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg);
+ pp_div &= ~BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK;
+ pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP((seq->t11_t12 + 1), 1000)
+ << BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT);
+ } else {
+ pp_div = ((100 * div)/2 - 1) << PP_REFERENCE_DIVIDER_SHIFT;
+ pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12, 1000)
+ << PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT);
+ }
/* Haswell doesn't have any port selection bits for the panel
* power sequencer any more. */
@@ -5108,11 +5145,17 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct
drm_device *dev,
I915_WRITE(pp_on_reg, pp_on);
I915_WRITE(pp_off_reg, pp_off);
- I915_WRITE(pp_div_reg, pp_div);
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev))
+ I915_WRITE(pp_ctrl_reg, pp_div);
+ else
+ I915_WRITE(pp_div_reg, pp_div);
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("panel power sequencer register settings: PP_ON %#x, PP_OFF
%#x, PP_DIV %#x\n",
I915_READ(pp_on_reg),
I915_READ(pp_off_reg),
+ IS_BROXTON(dev) ?
+ ((I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg) && BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK)
Should be & not &&. Not sure if the shift is needed really.
Oops !!
Thanks..
BR,
Jani.
+ >> BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT) :
I915_READ(pp_div_reg));
}
--
2.0.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
