2015-06-15 12:14 GMT-03:00 Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>:
> It's simply a bit too scary on pre-gen6 and imo not worth the bother
> really until someone starts to implement all the hacks an w/a required
> on these platforms. On later platforms the issues are just with
> correctness and performance hence no risk for hanging machines.
>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> ---
> tests/kms_fbc_crc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c b/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c
> index d9642243465c..f2a86a690767 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c
> @@ -562,7 +562,8 @@ igt_main
> igt_require_f(!strstr(buf, "unsupported on this chipset"),
> "FBC not supported\n");
>
> - igt_set_module_param_int("enable_fbc", 1);
> + if (intel_gen(data.devid) >= 6)
> + igt_set_module_param_int("enable_fbc", 1);
I would prefer the more explicit:
igt_require_f(intel_gen(data.devid) >= 6, "Too afraid to test this.");
igt_set_module_param_int("enable_fbc", 1);
We also need to patch kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c, but I can do this
after your patch if you want.
>
> data.bufmgr = drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_init(data.drm_fd, 4096);
> igt_assert(data.bufmgr);
> --
> 2.1.4
>
--
Paulo Zanoni
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
