On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 03:34:55PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:53:10AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > From: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]> > > > > Let's make sure the future Paulos don't forget that we need > > struct_mutex when touching dev_priv->mm.stolen. > > As I elluded to in patch 5, I think the stolen warns are a misstep.
Imo switching to a separate stolen_mutex should be a separate patch, this just documents the current rules. Which seems fine to me. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
