Op 07-07-15 om 11:15 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> Since
>
> commit 8c7b5ccb729870e606321b3703e2c2e698c49a95
> Author: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <[email protected]>
> Date:   Tue Apr 21 17:13:19 2015 +0300
>
>     drm/i915: Use atomic helpers for computing changed flags
>
> we compute the plane state for a modeset before actually committing
> any changes, which means crtc->active won't be correct yet. Looking at
> future work in the modeset conversion targetting 4.3 the only places
> where crtc_state->active isn't accurate is when disabling other CRTCs
> than the one the modeset is for (when stealing connectors). Which
> isn't the case here. And that's also confirmed by an audit, we do
> unconditionally update crtc_state->active for the current pipe.
>
> We also don't need to update any other plane check functions since we
> only ever add the primary state to the modeset update right now.
>
> Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <[email protected]>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 647b1404c441..ba9321998a41 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -13276,7 +13276,7 @@ intel_check_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
>       if (ret)
>               return ret;
>  
> -     if (intel_crtc->active) {
> +     if (crtc_state->base.active) {
>               struct intel_plane_state *old_state =
>                       to_intel_plane_state(plane->state);
>  
I think this was probably a feature, not a bug. Since full atomic planes won't 
be part of v4.2
both patches look ok to me.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to