On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 04:35:50PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> By Vesa DP 1.2 spec TEST_CRC_COUNT is a "4 bit wrap counter which
> increments each time the TEST_CRC_x_x are updated."
> 
> However if we are trying to verify the screen hasn't changed we get
> same (count, crc) pair twice. Without this patch we would return
> -ETIMEOUT in this case.
> 
> So, if in 6 vblanks the pair (count, crc) hasn't changed we
> return it anyway instead of returning error and let test case decide
> if it was right or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>

Looks good.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index c7372a1..e99ec7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4028,6 +4028,7 @@ int intel_dp_sink_crc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 
> *crc)
>       u8 buf;
>       int count, ret;
>       int attempts = 6;
> +     bool old_equal_new;
>  
>       ret = intel_dp_sink_crc_start(intel_dp);
>       if (ret)
> @@ -4042,6 +4043,7 @@ int intel_dp_sink_crc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 
> *crc)
>                       goto stop;
>               }
>               count = buf & DP_TEST_COUNT_MASK;
> +
>               /*
>                * Count might be reset during the loop. In this case
>                * last known count needs to be reset as well.
> @@ -4053,17 +4055,24 @@ int intel_dp_sink_crc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 
> *crc)
>                       ret = -EIO;
>                       goto stop;
>               }
> -     } while (--attempts && (count == 0 || (count == 
> intel_dp->sink_crc.last_count &&
> -                                            
> !memcmp(intel_dp->sink_crc.last_crc, crc,
> -                                                    6 * sizeof(u8)))));
> +
> +             old_equal_new = (count == intel_dp->sink_crc.last_count &&
> +                              !memcmp(intel_dp->sink_crc.last_crc, crc,
> +                                      6 * sizeof(u8)));
> +
> +     } while (--attempts && (count == 0 || old_equal_new));
>  
>       intel_dp->sink_crc.last_count = buf & DP_TEST_COUNT_MASK;
>       memcpy(intel_dp->sink_crc.last_crc, crc, 6 * sizeof(u8));
>  
>       if (attempts == 0) {
> -             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Panel is unable to calculate CRC after 6 
> vblanks\n");
> -             ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> -             goto stop;
> +             if (old_equal_new) {
> +                     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unreliable Sink CRC counter: Current 
> returned CRC is identical to the previous one\n");

Isn't this line a little too long?

> +             } else {
> +                     DRM_ERROR("Panel is unable to calculate any CRC after 6 
> vblanks\n");
> +                     ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +                     goto stop;
> +             }
>       }
>  
>  stop:
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to