On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 07:54 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:49:30AM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > It is possible the we request to have a mode that has
> > higher pixel clock than our HW can support. This patch
> > checks if requested pixel clock is lower than the one
> > supported by the HW. The requested mode is discarded
> > if we cannot support the requested pixel clock.
> >
> > This patch applies to HDMI.
> >
> > V2:
> > - removed computation for max dot clock
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kah...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > index 70bad5b..b85efaa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > @@ -1191,15 +1191,22 @@ intel_hdmi_mode_valid(struct drm_connector
> > *connector,
> > {
> > struct intel_hdmi *hdmi = intel_attached_hdmi(connector);
> > struct drm_device *dev = intel_hdmi_to_dev(hdmi);
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > enum drm_mode_status status;
> > int clock;
> > + int max_pixclk = dev_priv->max_dotclk;
> >
> > if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN)
> > return MODE_NO_DBLESCAN;
> >
> > clock = mode->clock;
> > - if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK)
> > + if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK) {
> > clock *= 2;
> > + max_pixclk *= 2;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (clock > max_pixclk)
> > + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>
> Or do the test before the DBLCLK?
Yes, I could move the test before DBLCLK.
-Mika-
> -Chris
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
