On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 04:13:52PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2015-08-12 12:44 GMT-03:00 <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > The PORTA HPD defines are not BXT specific. They also exist on SPT,
> > and partially already on LPT:LP.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 10 +++++-----
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > index 8a1e35e..d12106c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > @@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ static bool bxt_port_hotplug_long_detect(enum port
> > port, u32 val)
> > {
> > switch (port) {
> > case PORT_A:
> > - return val & BXT_PORTA_HOTPLUG_LONG_DETECT;
> > + return val & PORTA_HOTPLUG_LONG_DETECT;
> > case PORT_B:
> > return val & PORTB_HOTPLUG_LONG_DETECT;
> > case PORT_C:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index ed2d150..0e9990b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -6002,11 +6002,11 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
> >
> > /* digital port hotplug */
> > #define PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG 0xc4030 /* SHOTPLUG_CTL */
> > -#define BXT_PORTA_HOTPLUG_ENABLE (1 << 28)
> > -#define BXT_PORTA_HOTPLUG_STATUS_MASK (3 << 24)
> > -#define BXT_PORTA_HOTPLUG_NO_DETECT (0 << 24)
> > -#define BXT_PORTA_HOTPLUG_SHORT_DETECT (1 << 24)
> > -#define BXT_PORTA_HOTPLUG_LONG_DETECT (2 << 24)
> > +#define PORTA_HOTPLUG_ENABLE (1 << 28) /* LPT:LP+ & BXT */
>
> Although the doc for LPT _suggests_ this is only for LPT:LP, it
> doesn't mark this bit as LPT:LP-specific just like it marks all the
> other LPT:LP-specific bits in every register, so I wonder if this is
> really LPT:LP or if there's another way to find this out, like some
> strap or VBT bit.
Just did a quick experiment and the bit won't stick on my desktop machine
with LPT-H, but it will on a ULT with LPT-LP. So looks like that part of
the patch is at least correct, unless some strap would affect whether
the bit even sticks or not.
>
> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
>
> > +#define PORTA_HOTPLUG_STATUS_MASK (3 << 24) /* SPT+ & BXT */
> > +#define PORTA_HOTPLUG_NO_DETECT (0 << 24) /* SPT+ & BXT */
> > +#define PORTA_HOTPLUG_SHORT_DETECT (1 << 24) /* SPT+ & BXT */
> > +#define PORTA_HOTPLUG_LONG_DETECT (2 << 24) /* SPT+ & BXT */
> > #define PORTD_HOTPLUG_ENABLE (1 << 20)
> > #define PORTD_PULSE_DURATION_2ms (0 << 18)
> > #define PORTD_PULSE_DURATION_4_5ms (1 << 18)
> > --
> > 2.4.6
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
>
>
> --
> Paulo Zanoni
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
