On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 04:08:04PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
Not sure this is worth it ... I'll punt for now. But if you add a bit of
justification that we could get rid of update_state_fb entirely it would
look better ;-)
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index b809ee2a8678..f41ca558ba3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -15353,9 +15353,9 @@ void intel_modeset_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> DRM_ERROR("failed to pin boot fb on pipe %d\n",
> to_intel_crtc(c)->pipe);
> drm_framebuffer_unreference(c->primary->fb);
> - c->primary->fb = NULL;
> + drm_framebuffer_unreference(c->primary->state->fb);
> + c->primary->fb = c->primary->state->fb = NULL;
> c->primary->crtc = c->primary->state->crtc = NULL;
> - update_state_fb(c->primary);
> c->state->plane_mask &= ~(1 <<
> drm_plane_index(c->primary));
> }
> }
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
