On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Uma Shankar <uma.shan...@intel.com> wrote:
> DSI backlight support for bxt is added.
>
> TODO: There is no support for backlight control in drm panel
>       framework. This will be added as part of VBT version patches
>       fixing the backlight sequence.
>
> v2: Fixed Jani's review comments from previous patch. Added the
>     BXT DSI backlight code in this patch. Backlight setup and
>     enable/disable code for backlight is added in intel_dsi.c.
>
> v3: Rebased on latest drm-nightly. Fixed Jani's review comments.

I'm not sure why these calls need to be within IS_BROXTON blocks. What
happens with the current backlight calls? Shouldn't we just have one set
of calls?

Also, I think we should get this [1] in first, and see how that affects
things.

BR,
Jani.


[1] http://mid.gmane.org/cover.1442227790.git.jani.nik...@intel.com

>
> Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shan...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c |   20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> index 08bade2..aee1539 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> @@ -438,6 +438,7 @@ static void intel_dsi_enable(struct intel_encoder 
> *encoder)
>       struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>       struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> +     struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dsi->attached_connector;
>       enum port port;
>  
>       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
> @@ -458,6 +459,11 @@ static void intel_dsi_enable(struct intel_encoder 
> *encoder)
>  
>               intel_dsi_port_enable(encoder);
>       }
> +
> +     if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
> +             msleep(intel_dsi->backlight_on_delay);
> +             intel_panel_enable_backlight(intel_connector);
> +     }
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> @@ -623,10 +629,16 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder 
> *encoder)
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = encoder->base.dev->dev_private;
>       struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> +     struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dsi->attached_connector;
>       u32 val;
>  
>       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>  
> +     if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv->dev)) {
> +             intel_panel_disable_backlight(intel_connector);
> +             msleep(intel_dsi->backlight_off_delay);
> +     }
> +
>       intel_dsi_disable(encoder);
>  
>       intel_dsi_clear_device_ready(encoder);
> @@ -1226,8 +1238,14 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>  
>       intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, NULL);
>  
> -     return;
> +     /*
> +      * Pipe parameter is not used for BXT.
> +      * Passing INVALID_PIPE to adher to API requirement.
> +      */
> +     if (IS_BROXTON(dev))
> +             intel_panel_setup_backlight(connector, INVALID_PIPE);
>  
> +     return;
>  err:
>       drm_encoder_cleanup(&intel_encoder->base);
>       kfree(intel_dsi);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to