On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 12:18:26PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Often it is very useful to know why we suddenly purge vast tracts of
> memory and surprisingly up until now we didn't even have a tracepoint
> for when we shrink our memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c |  2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h        | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
> index b627d07fad29..88f66a2586ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ i915_gem_shrink(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>       }, *phase;
>       unsigned long count = 0;
>  
> +     trace_i915_gem_shrink(dev_priv, target, flags);

Shouldn't we also dump how many pages we actually managed to shrink, i.e.
count (at the end of the functions).

Also we have a slab_start/end tracepoint already, but that one obviously
doesn't cover the internal calls to i915_gem_shrink. Should imo be
mentioned in the commit message.
-Daniel

> +
>       /*
>        * As we may completely rewrite the (un)bound list whilst unbinding
>        * (due to retiring requests) we have to strictly process only
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> index e6b5c7470ba0..ed7f42f2e740 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> @@ -107,6 +107,26 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_object_create,
>           TP_printk("obj=%p, size=%u", __entry->obj, __entry->size)
>  );
>  
> +TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_shrink,
> +         TP_PROTO(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned long target, 
> unsigned flags),
> +         TP_ARGS(i915, target, flags),
> +
> +         TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +                          __field(int, dev)
> +                          __field(unsigned long, target)
> +                          __field(unsigned, flags)
> +                          ),
> +
> +         TP_fast_assign(
> +                        __entry->dev = i915->dev->primary->index;
> +                        __entry->target = target;
> +                        __entry->flags = flags;
> +                        ),
> +
> +         TP_printk("dev=%d, target=%lu, flags=%x",
> +                   __entry->dev, __entry->target, __entry->flags)
> +);
> +
>  TRACE_EVENT(i915_vma_bind,
>           TP_PROTO(struct i915_vma *vma, unsigned flags),
>           TP_ARGS(vma, flags),
> -- 
> 2.6.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to