Reduced the Sleep period to 200mS and reduced the repetition count to 7
to decrease the test run time significantly.

Also fixed a non ascii character that messed up the results table formatting.

v2: Changed uS to us

Signed-off-by: Derek Morton <derek.j.mor...@intel.com>
---
 tests/gem_exec_nop.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_nop.c b/tests/gem_exec_nop.c
index a287d08..998e0eb 100644
--- a/tests/gem_exec_nop.c
+++ b/tests/gem_exec_nop.c
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static void loop(int fd, uint32_t handle, unsigned ring_id, 
const char *ring_nam
        gem_sync(fd, handle);
 
        for (count = 1; count <= SLOW_QUICK(1<<17, 1<<4); count <<= 1) {
-               const int reps = 13;
+               const int reps = 7;
                igt_stats_t stats;
                int n;
 
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static void loop(int fd, uint32_t handle, unsigned ring_id, 
const char *ring_nam
                for (n = 0; n < reps; n++) {
                        struct timespec start, end;
                        int loops = count;
-                       sleep(1); /* wait for the hw to go back to sleep */
+                       usleep(200000); /* wait 200mS for the hw to go back to 
sleep */
                        clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &start);
                        while (loops--)
                                do_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_EXECBUFFER2, 
&execbuf);
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static void loop(int fd, uint32_t handle, unsigned ring_id, 
const char *ring_nam
                        igt_stats_push(&stats, elapsed(&start, &end, count));
                }
 
-               igt_info("Time to exec x %d:            %7.3fµs (ring=%s)\n",
+               igt_info("Time to exec x %d:            %7.3fus (ring=%s)\n",
                         count, igt_stats_get_trimean(&stats)/1000, ring_name);
                fflush(stdout);
 
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to