'commit 97173eaf5 ("drm/i915: PSR: Increase idle_frames")' was a mistake.
The special case it tried to cover is already being covered by
the DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT. So let's remove this mistake instead of
start using 9 idle frames for that case.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index ee426ea..4e3d315 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -249,12 +249,9 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp
*intel_dp)
/* Lately it was identified that depending on panel idle frame count
* calculated at HW can be off by 1. So let's use what came
* from VBT + 1.
- * There are also other cases where panel demands at least 4
- * but VBT is not being set. To cover these 2 cases lets use
- * at least 5 when VBT isn't set to be on the safest side.
*/
uint32_t idle_frames = dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames ?
- dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames + 1 : 5;
+ dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames + 1 : 2;
uint32_t val = 0x0;
const uint32_t link_entry_time = EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
--
2.4.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
