> commit ac9b8236551d1177fd07b56aef9b565d1864420d > Author: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > Date: Fri Nov 27 18:55:26 2015 +0200 > > drm/i915: Introduce a gmbus power domain > > gmbus also needs the power domain infrastructure right from the start, > since as soon as we register the i2c controllers someone can use them. > > v2: Adjust cleanup paths too (Chris). > > v3: Rebase onto -nightly (totally bogus tree I had lying around) and > also move dpio init head (Ville). > > v4: Ville instead suggested to move gmbus setup later in the sequence, > since it's only needed by the modeset code. > > v5: Move even close to the actual user, right next to the comment that > states where we really need gmbus (and interrupts!). > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <[email protected]> > Cc: Imre Deak <[email protected]> > Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> > Cc: Meelis Roos <[email protected]> > Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > Fixes: ac9b8236551d ("drm/i915: Introduce a gmbus power domain") > Cc: [email protected] > References: http://www.spinics.net/lists/intel-gfx/msg83075.html > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> > --- > > Meelis, can you pls retest this one?
I also confirmed that my 865G chipset computer was suffering from the same problem and the patch also helps on D865GLC mainboard with my userspace that autoloads eeprom driver. -- Meelis Roos ([email protected]) _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
