On 11/01/16 15:04, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

On 11/01/16 14:36, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:08:40PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>

No need to call ktime_get_raw_ns twice per unlimited wait and can
also elimate a local variable.

But we could eliminate both, and the unsightly pointless assignment only
required to shut gcc up.

Still preferring my patch.

Ah I remember it now.. you were storing it in the pointer provided by
the caller. I think that is significantly worse, sorry cannot approve that.

Regards,

Tvrtko

Local variable good, pointer indirection through parameter bad.

Reviewed-by: Dave Gordon <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to