>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
>Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 12:37 PM
>To: Morton, Derek J <[email protected]>; [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/4] tests/gem_scheduler: Add
>gem_scheduler test
>
>Hi,
>
>first round of comments inline. A few things will probably have to change
>based on the comments on the previous patch in the series so I'll have a
>better look at the related logic once the new series is up.
>
>Regards,
>Daniele
>
>
>On 12/02/16 09:38, Derek Morton wrote:
>> This is intended to test the scheduler behaviour is correct.
>> The subtests are
>> <ring>-basic
>> Tests that batch buffers of the same priority submitted to a ring
>> execute in the order they are submitted.
>> <ring>-read
>> Submits a batch buffer with a read dependency to a buffer object to a
>> ring which is held in the scheduler queue by a long running batch
>> buffer. Submit batch buffers to other rings that have a read
>> dependency to the same buffer object. Ensure they execute before the
>> batch buffer being held up behind the long running batch buffer.
>> <ring>-write
>> Submits a batch buffer with a write dependency to a buffer object to a
>> ring which is held in the scheduler queue by a long running batch
>> buffer. Submit batch buffers to other rings that have a write
>> dependency to the same buffer object. Submit batch buffers with no
>> interdependencies to all rings. Ensure the batch buffers that have
>> write dependencies are executed in submission order but the batch
>> buffers without interdependencies do not get held up.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Derek Morton <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> tests/Makefile.sources | 1 +
>> tests/gem_scheduler.c | 409
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 410 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 tests/gem_scheduler.c
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.sources b/tests/Makefile.sources index
>> df92586..439f62c 100644
>> --- a/tests/Makefile.sources
>> +++ b/tests/Makefile.sources
>> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ TESTS_progs_M = \
>> gem_request_retire \
>> gem_reset_stats \
>> gem_ringfill \
>> + gem_scheduler \
>> gem_set_tiling_vs_blt \
>> gem_softpin \
>> gem_stolen \
>> diff --git a/tests/gem_scheduler.c b/tests/gem_scheduler.c new file
>> mode 100644 index 0000000..4824c13
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/gem_scheduler.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,409 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2016 Intel Corporation
>> + *
>> + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
>> +obtaining a
>> + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
>> +"Software"),
>> + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without
>> +limitation
>> + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute,
>> +sublicense,
>> + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom
>> +the
>> + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
>> + *
>> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including
>> +the next
>> + * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions
>> +of the
>> + * Software.
>> + *
>> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
>> +EXPRESS OR
>> + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
>> +MERCHANTABILITY,
>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT
>> +SHALL
>> + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES
>> +OR OTHER
>> + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
>> +ARISING
>> + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
>> +OTHER DEALINGS
>> + * IN THE SOFTWARE.
>> + *
>> + * Authors:
>> + * Derek Morton <[email protected]>
>> + *
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "igt.h"
>> +#include <unistd.h>
>> +#include <stdlib.h>
>> +#include <stdint.h>
>> +#include <stdio.h>
>> +#include <string.h>
>> +#include <inttypes.h>
>> +#include <time.h>
>> +#include <sys/stat.h>
>> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
>> +#include <fcntl.h>
>> +
>> +IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Check scheduler behaviour. Basic tests ensure
>> independant "
>> + "batch buffers of the same priority are executed in "
>> + "submission order. Read-read tests ensure "
>> + "batch buffers with a read dependency to the same
>> buffer "
>> + "object do not block each other. Write-write
>> dependency "
>> + "tests ensure batch buffers with a write dependency to
>> a "
>> + "buffer object will be executed in submission order
>> but "
>> + "will not block execution of other independant batch "
>> + "buffers.");
>> +
>> +#define SEC_TO_NSEC (1000 * 1000 * 1000)
>> +
>> +struct ring {
>> + const char *name;
>> + int id;
>> +} rings[] = {
>> + { "render", I915_EXEC_RENDER },
>> + { "bsd", I915_EXEC_BSD },
>
>Is BSD1/BSD2 difference of any importance for the tests?
>
>> + { "blt", I915_EXEC_BLT },
>> + { "vebox", I915_EXEC_VEBOX },
>> +};
>
>This is a slight duplication of intel_execution_engines. However, I'm not sure
>that intel_execution_engines is suitable here considering that it doesn't seem
>you want to check both the vanilla I915_EXEC_BSD case and the BSD1/BSD2 case
Hmm. If there is more than 1 BSD ring the test will fail as the in flight queue
will not be filled correctly if submitted batch buffers are shared over 2
rings. intel_execution_engines is not appropriate here either because it has
BSD BSD1 and BSD2 as separate rings. I would need to use BSD or BSD1 and BSD2.
Will need to think about how to handle that efficiently.
>
>> +
>> +#define NBR_RINGS (sizeof(rings)/sizeof(struct ring))
>> +
>> +/* Basic test. Check batch buffers of the same priority and with no
>> +dependencies
>> + * are executed in the order they are submitted.
>> + */
>> +#define NBR_BASIC_FDs (3)
>> +static void run_test_basic(int in_flight, int ringid) {
>> + int fd[NBR_BASIC_FDs];
>> + int loop;
>> + drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr[NBR_BASIC_FDs];
>> + uint32_t *delay_buf, *ts1_buf, *ts2_buf;
>> + struct intel_batchbuffer *ts1_bb, *ts2_bb;
>> + struct intel_batchbuffer **in_flight_bbs;
>> + uint32_t calibrated_1s;
>> + drm_intel_bo *delay_bo, *ts1_bo, *ts2_bo;
>> +
>> + in_flight_bbs = malloc(in_flight * sizeof(struct intel_batchbuffer *));
>> + igt_assert(in_flight_bbs);
>> +
>> + /* Need multiple i915 fd's. Scheduler will not change execution order of
>> + * batch buffers from the same context.
>> + */
>> + for(loop=0; loop < NBR_BASIC_FDs; loop++) {
>> + struct intel_batchbuffer *noop_bb;
>> + fd[loop] = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
>> + igt_assert(fd[loop] >= 0);
>> + bufmgr[loop] = drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_init(fd[loop], BATCH_SZ);
>> + igt_assert(bufmgr[loop]);
>> + drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_enable_reuse(bufmgr[loop]);
>> + /* Send a noop batch buffer to force any deferred
>> initialisation */
>> + noop_bb = igt_create_noop_bb(fd[loop], bufmgr[loop], ringid, 5);
>> + intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(noop_bb, ringid);
>> + intel_batchbuffer_free(noop_bb);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Create buffer objects */
>> + delay_bo = drm_intel_bo_alloc(bufmgr[0], "delay bo", BATCH_SZ,
>> BATCH_SZ);
>> + igt_assert(delay_bo);
>> + ts1_bo = drm_intel_bo_alloc(bufmgr[1], "ts1 bo", BATCH_SZ, BATCH_SZ);
>> + igt_assert(ts1_bo);
>> + ts2_bo = drm_intel_bo_alloc(bufmgr[2], "ts2 bo", BATCH_SZ, BATCH_SZ);
>> + igt_assert(ts2_bo);
>> +
>> + /* Put some non zero values in the delay bo */
>> + drm_intel_bo_map(delay_bo, 1);
>
>As I already mentioned on the other patch in some cases you could use a
>subdata/get_subdata call instead of the map/unmap dance
Can change to using get_subdata here. I will leave the bo_map calls further on
as more is done with those buffers.
>
>> + delay_buf = delay_bo->virtual;
>> + delay_buf[0] = 0xff;
>> + drm_intel_bo_unmap(delay_bo);
>> +
>> + calibrated_1s = igt_calibrate_delay_bb(fd[0], bufmgr[0], ringid);
>> +
>> + /* Batch buffers to fill the ring */
>
>"fill the ring" feels a bit unclear to me, because you're not filling the
>ringbuffer but the in-flight queue of the scheduler. Maybe use something like
>"reach the maximum number of in flight batches"?
Will change ring to in flight queue
>
>> + in_flight_bbs[0] = igt_create_delay_bb(fd[0], bufmgr[0], ringid,
>> calibrated_1s, delay_bo);
>> + for(loop = 1; loop < in_flight; loop++)
>> + in_flight_bbs[loop] = igt_create_noop_bb(fd[0], bufmgr[0],
>> ringid,
>> +5);
>> +
>> + /* Extra batch buffers in the scheduler queue */
>> + ts1_bb = igt_create_timestamp_bb(fd[1], bufmgr[1], ringid, ts1_bo,
>> NULL, false);
>> + ts2_bb = igt_create_timestamp_bb(fd[2], bufmgr[2], ringid, ts2_bo,
>> +NULL, false);
>> +
>> + /* Flush batchbuffers */
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < in_flight; loop++)
>> + intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(in_flight_bbs[loop], ringid);
>> + intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(ts1_bb, ringid);
>> + intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(ts2_bb, ringid);
>> +
>> + /* This will not return until the bo has finished executing */
>> + drm_intel_bo_map(delay_bo, 0);
>> + drm_intel_bo_map(ts1_bo, 0);
>> + drm_intel_bo_map(ts2_bo, 0);
>> +
>> + delay_buf = delay_bo->virtual;
>> + ts1_buf = ts1_bo->virtual;
>> + ts2_buf = ts2_bo->virtual;
>> +
>> + igt_debug("Delay Timestamp = 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n", delay_buf[2]);
>> + igt_debug("TS1 Timestamp = 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n", ts1_buf[0]);
>> + igt_debug("TS2 Timestamp = 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n", ts2_buf[0]);
>> +
>> + /* buf[0] in the target buffer should be 0 if the batch buffer
>> completed */
>> + igt_assert_f(delay_buf[0] == 0,
>> + "delay_buf[0] expected 0x0, got 0x%" PRIx32 "\n",
>> +delay_buf[0]);
>> +
>> + igt_assert_f(igt_compare_timestamps(delay_buf[2], ts1_buf[0]),
>> + "Delay ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ") > TS1 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ")\n",
>> + delay_buf[2], ts1_buf[0]);
>> + igt_assert_f(igt_compare_timestamps(ts1_buf[0], ts2_buf[0]),
>> + "TS1 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ") > TS2 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ")\n",
>> + ts1_buf[0], ts2_buf[0]);
>> +
>> + /* Cleanup */
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < in_flight; loop++)
>> + intel_batchbuffer_free(in_flight_bbs[loop]);
>> + intel_batchbuffer_free(ts1_bb);
>> + intel_batchbuffer_free(ts2_bb);
>> +
>> + drm_intel_bo_unreference(delay_bo);
>> + drm_intel_bo_unreference(ts1_bo);
>> + drm_intel_bo_unreference(ts2_bo);
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < 3; loop++) {
>
>3 -> NBR_BASIC_FDs
I missed that one....
>
>> + drm_intel_bufmgr_destroy(bufmgr[loop]);
>> + close(fd[loop]);
>> + }
>> + free(in_flight_bbs);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Dependency test.
>> + * write=0, Submit batch buffers with read dependencies to all rings.
>> +Delay one
>> + * with a long executing batch buffer. Check the others are not held up.
>> + * write=1, Submit batch buffers with write dependencies to all
>> +rings. Delay one
>> + * with a long executing batch buffer. Also submit batch buffers with
>> +no
>> + * dependencies to all rings. Batch buffers with write dependencies
>> +should be
>> + * executed in submission order. The batch buffers with no
>> +dependencies should
>> + * not be held up.
>> + */
>> +static void run_test_dependency(int in_flight, int ring, bool write)
>
>This function contains several setup/cleanup loops that make the actual test
>logic itself a bit difficult to isolate. Maybe those could be moved to helper
>function to make the distinction clearer
Ok
>
>> +{
>> + int fd[NBR_RINGS], fd2[NBR_RINGS];
>> + int loop;
>> + int prime_fd;
>> + uint32_t *delay_buf, *ts_buf[NBR_RINGS], *ts2_buf[NBR_RINGS],
>> *shared_buf;
>> + uint32_t calibrated_1s;
>> + drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr[NBR_RINGS], *bufmgr2[NBR_RINGS];
>> + struct intel_batchbuffer *ts_bb[NBR_RINGS], *ts2_bb[NBR_RINGS],
>> **in_flight_bbs;
>> + drm_intel_bo *delay_bo, *ts_bo[NBR_RINGS], *ts2_bo[NBR_RINGS],
>> +*shared_bo[NBR_RINGS];
>> +
>> + in_flight_bbs = malloc(in_flight * sizeof(struct intel_batchbuffer *));
>> + igt_assert(in_flight_bbs);
>> +
>> + /* Need multiple i915 fd's. Scheduler will not change execution order of
>> + * batch buffers from the same context.
>> + */
>> + for(loop=0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++) {
>> + struct intel_batchbuffer *noop_bb;
>> + fd[loop] = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
>> + igt_assert(fd[loop] >= 0);
>> + bufmgr[loop] = drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_init(fd[loop], BATCH_SZ);
>> + igt_assert(bufmgr[loop]);
>> + drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_enable_reuse(bufmgr[loop]);
>> + /* Send a noop batch buffer to force any deferred
>> initialisation */
>> + noop_bb = igt_create_noop_bb(fd[loop], bufmgr[loop],
>> rings[loop].id, 5);
>> + intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(noop_bb, rings[loop].id);
>> + intel_batchbuffer_free(noop_bb);
>
>The fd opening code is duplicated several times in this file. Could use a
>static function to reduce duplication
Ok
>
>> + if(write) {
>> + struct intel_batchbuffer *noop_bb2;
>> + fd2[loop] = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
>> + igt_assert(fd2[loop] >= 0);
>> + bufmgr2[loop] = drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_init(fd2[loop],
>> BATCH_SZ);
>> + igt_assert(bufmgr2[loop]);
>> + drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_enable_reuse(bufmgr2[loop]);
>> + /* Send a noop batch buffer to force any deferred
>> initialisation */
>> + noop_bb2 = igt_create_noop_bb(fd2[loop], bufmgr2[loop],
>> rings[loop].id, 5);
>> + intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(noop_bb2,
>> rings[loop].id);
>> + intel_batchbuffer_free(noop_bb2);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Create buffer objects */
>> + delay_bo = drm_intel_bo_alloc(bufmgr[ring], "delay bo", BATCH_SZ,
>> BATCH_SZ);
>> + igt_assert(delay_bo);
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++) {
>> + ts_bo[loop] = drm_intel_bo_alloc(bufmgr[loop], "ts bo",
>> BATCH_SZ, BATCH_SZ);
>> + igt_assert(ts_bo[loop]);
>> + if(write) {
>> + ts2_bo[loop] = drm_intel_bo_alloc(bufmgr2[loop], "ts
>> bo", BATCH_SZ, BATCH_SZ);
>> + igt_assert(ts2_bo[loop]);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Create shared buffer object */
>> + shared_bo[0] = drm_intel_bo_alloc(bufmgr[0], "shared bo", BATCH_SZ,
>> BATCH_SZ);
>> + igt_assert(shared_bo[0]);
>> +
>> + drm_intel_bo_gem_export_to_prime(shared_bo[0], &prime_fd);
>> + for(loop = 1; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++) {
>> + shared_bo[loop] =
>> drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_prime(bufmgr[loop],
>> + prime_fd,
>> BATCH_SZ);
>> + igt_assert(shared_bo[loop]);
>> + }
>> + close(prime_fd);
>> +
>> + /* Put some non zero values in the delay and shared bo */
>> + drm_intel_bo_map(delay_bo, 1);
>> + delay_buf = delay_bo->virtual;
>> + delay_buf[0] = 0xff;
>> + drm_intel_bo_unmap(delay_bo);
>> + drm_intel_bo_map(shared_bo[0], 1);
>> + shared_buf = shared_bo[0]->virtual;
>> + shared_buf[0] = 0xff00ff00;
>> + drm_intel_bo_unmap(shared_bo[0]);
>> +
>> + calibrated_1s = igt_calibrate_delay_bb(fd[ring], bufmgr[ring],
>> +rings[ring].id);
>> +
>> + /* Batch buffers to fill the ring */
>> + in_flight_bbs[0] = igt_create_delay_bb(fd[ring], bufmgr[ring],
>> + rings[ring].id, calibrated_1s,
>> delay_bo);
>> + for(loop = 1; loop < in_flight; loop++)
>> + in_flight_bbs[loop] = igt_create_noop_bb(fd[ring], bufmgr[ring],
>> + rings[ring].id, 5);
>> +
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++) {
>> + ts_bb[loop] = igt_create_timestamp_bb(fd[loop], bufmgr[loop],
>> + rings[loop].id, ts_bo[loop], shared_bo[loop],
>> write);
>> + if(write)
>> + ts2_bb[loop] = igt_create_timestamp_bb(fd2[loop],
>> bufmgr2[loop],
>> + rings[loop].id, ts2_bo[loop], NULL,
>> false);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Flush batchbuffers */
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < in_flight; loop++)
>> + intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(in_flight_bbs[loop],
>> +rings[ring].id);
>> +
>> + intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(ts_bb[ring], rings[ring].id);
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++)
>> + if(loop != ring)
>> + intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(ts_bb[loop],
>> rings[loop].id);
>> +
>> + if(write) {
>> + intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(ts2_bb[ring], rings[ring].id);
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++)
>> + if(loop != ring)
>> + intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(ts2_bb[loop],
>> rings[loop].id);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* This will not return until the bo has finished executing */
>> + drm_intel_bo_map(delay_bo, 0);
>> + delay_buf = delay_bo->virtual;
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++) {
>> + drm_intel_bo_map(ts_bo[loop], 0);
>> + ts_buf[loop] = ts_bo[loop]->virtual;
>> + if(write) {
>> + drm_intel_bo_map(ts2_bo[loop], 0);
>> + ts2_buf[loop] = ts2_bo[loop]->virtual;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* buf[0] in the target buffer should be 0 if the batch buffer
>> completed */
>> + igt_assert_f(delay_buf[0] == 0,
>> + "delay_buf[0] expected 0x0, got 0x%" PRIx32 "\n",
>> + delay_buf[0]);
>> +
>> + igt_debug("%6s delay timestamp = 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n",
>> + rings[ring].name, delay_buf[2]);
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++)
>> + igt_debug("%6s batch timestamp = 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n",
>> + rings[loop].name, ts_buf[loop][0]);
>> +
>> + if(write) {
>> + igt_debug("Independant batch buffers\n");
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++)
>> + igt_debug("%6s batch timestamp = 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n",
>> + rings[loop].name, ts2_buf[loop][0]);
>> + }
>> +
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++) {
>> + if(loop != ring) {
>> + if(write) {
>> + /* Write dependency, delayed ring should run
>> first */
>> +
>> igt_assert_f(igt_compare_timestamps(ts_buf[ring][0], ts_buf[loop][0]),
>> + "%s ran before %s - 0x%08" PRIx32
>> " vs 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n",
>> + rings[loop].name, rings[ring].name,
>> + ts_buf[loop][0], ts_buf[ring][0]);
>> + /* Second bb without dependency should run
>> first */
>> +
>> igt_assert_f(igt_compare_timestamps(ts2_buf[loop][0], ts_buf[loop][0]),
>> + "(%s) independant bb was held up -
>> 0x%08" PRIx32 " vs 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n",
>> + rings[loop].name, ts_buf[loop][0],
>> ts2_buf[loop][0]);
>> + }
>> + else
>> + /* Read dependency, delayed ring should run
>> last */
>> +
>> igt_assert_f(igt_compare_timestamps(ts_buf[loop][0], ts_buf[ring][0]),
>> + "%s ran after %s - 0x%08" PRIx32 "
>> vs 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n",
>> + rings[loop].name, rings[ring].name,
>> + ts_buf[loop][0], ts_buf[ring][0]);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Cleanup */
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < in_flight; loop++)
>> + intel_batchbuffer_free(in_flight_bbs[loop]);
>> +
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++) {
>> + intel_batchbuffer_free(ts_bb[loop]);
>> + drm_intel_bo_unreference(ts_bo[loop]);
>> + drm_intel_bo_unreference(shared_bo[loop]);
>> + if(write) {
>> + intel_batchbuffer_free(ts2_bb[loop]);
>> + drm_intel_bo_unreference(ts2_bo[loop]);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + drm_intel_bo_unreference(delay_bo);
>> +
>> + for(loop = 0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++) {
>> + drm_intel_bufmgr_destroy(bufmgr[loop]);
>> + close(fd[loop]);
>> + if(write) {
>> + drm_intel_bufmgr_destroy(bufmgr2[loop]);
>> + close(fd2[loop]);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + free(in_flight_bbs);
>> +}
>> +
>> +igt_main
>> +{
>> + int loop;
>> + int in_flight;
>> +
>> + igt_fixture {
>> + int debug_fd;
>> + int l;
>> + char buf[6];
>> + /* Get nbr of batch buffers that the scheduler will queue in the
>> + * HW. If this debugfs file does not exist there is no scheduler
>> + * so skip the test.
>> + */
>> + debug_fd = igt_debugfs_open("i915_scheduler_min_flying",
>> O_RDONLY);
>> + igt_skip_on(debug_fd == -1);
>> + l = read(debug_fd, buf, sizeof(buf)-1);
>> + igt_assert(l > 0);
>> + igt_assert(l < sizeof(buf));
>> + buf[l] = '\0';
>> + /* May be a decimal or hex number depending on sheduler version
>> */
>> + if(sscanf(buf, "0x%2x", &in_flight) != 1)
>> + igt_assert_f(sscanf(buf, "%2d", &in_flight) == 1,
>> + "Error reading from
>> i915_scheduler_min_flying\n");
>
>This will probably stabilize before the scheduler is merged, so the final
>version should probably have only 1 sscanf call
I will leave it as is for now.
>
>> + close(debug_fd);
>> + igt_debug("in flight = %d\n", in_flight);
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (loop=0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++)
>> + igt_subtest_f("%s-basic", rings[loop].name) {
>> + run_test_basic(in_flight, rings[loop].id);
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (loop=0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++)
>> + igt_subtest_f("%s-read", rings[loop].name) {
>> + run_test_dependency(in_flight, loop, false);
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (loop=0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++)
>> + igt_subtest_f("%s-write", rings[loop].name) {
>> + run_test_dependency(in_flight, loop, true);
>> + }
>> +
>> +}
>
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
