On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 14:39 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 02:22:58PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 14:21 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:00:14PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > > > -       gem_set_domain(fd, fb->gem_handle,
> > > > -                      I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU,
> > > > I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU);
> > > > +       if (!fb->is_dumb)
> > > > +               gem_set_domain(fd, fb->gem_handle,
> > > > I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU,
> > > > +                              I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU);
> > > At the risk of opening a can-of-worms, what is the
> > > synchronisation
> > > protocol for dumb buffers? Even CPU access to a dumb needs set-
> > > domain 
> > > on
> > > Intel.
> > Then Intel is broken, because the literal entire point of dumb
> > buffers
> > is that you do not require driver-specific calls to operate them.
> > 
> > Map, populate, unmap, display.
> Don't forget to call dirtyfb then.

Are you talking about frontbuffer rendering, or pageflipping between
two dumb buffers?
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to