When a higher priority batch buffer bumps a lower priority batch
buffer all batch buffers in the scheduler queue get a small priority
increase. Added a subtest to check this behaviour.
Requested by Joonas Lahtinen during scheduler code review
Signed-off-by: Derek Morton <derek.j.mor...@intel.com>
---
tests/gem_scheduler.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 134 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/gem_scheduler.c b/tests/gem_scheduler.c
index 126ee97..0fbc6e9 100644
--- a/tests/gem_scheduler.c
+++ b/tests/gem_scheduler.c
@@ -254,6 +254,134 @@ static void run_test_basic(int in_flight, int ringid, int
priority)
free(in_flight_bbs);
}
+
+/* Test priority bump behaviour.
+ * When a batch buffer is bumped by a higher priority batch buffer all other
+ * batch buffers in the scheduler queue get their priority increased slightly.
+ * Submit two delay batch buffers then fill the in flight queue. Submit a
+ * slightly reduced priority batch buffer and a normal priority batch buffer.
+ * When the first delay batch buffer completes priority bumping should occur.
+ * Submit another normal priority batch buffer. It should not overtake the
+ * reduced priority batch buffer as its priority has been bumped.
+ */
+#define NBR_PRIO_BUMP_FDs (4)
+static void run_test_priority_bump(int in_flight, int ringid)
+{
+ int fd[NBR_PRIO_BUMP_FDs];
+ int loop;
+ drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr[NBR_PRIO_BUMP_FDs];
+ uint32_t *delay_buf, *delay2_buf, *ts1_buf, *ts2_buf, *ts3_buf;
+ struct intel_batchbuffer *ts1_bb, *ts2_bb, *ts3_bb;
+ struct intel_batchbuffer **in_flight_bbs;
+ uint32_t calibrated_1s;
+ drm_intel_bo *delay_bo, *delay2_bo ,*ts1_bo, *ts2_bo, *ts3_bo;
+
+ in_flight_bbs = malloc(in_flight * sizeof(struct intel_batchbuffer *));
+ igt_assert(in_flight_bbs);
+
+ /* Need multiple i915 fd's. Scheduler will not change execution order of
+ * batch buffers from the same context.
+ */
+ for(loop=0; loop < NBR_PRIO_BUMP_FDs; loop++)
+ init_context(&(fd[loop]), &(bufmgr[loop]), ringid);
+
+ /* Lower priority of first timestamp batch buffer
+ * Second timestamp batch buffer should overtake the first
+ * Second should then get bumped so the third does not overtake it
+ */
+ set_priority(fd[1], -1);
+
+ /* Create buffer objects */
+ delay_bo = create_and_check_bo(bufmgr[0], "delay bo");
+ delay2_bo = create_and_check_bo(bufmgr[0], "delay bo2");
+ ts1_bo = create_and_check_bo(bufmgr[1], "ts1 bo");
+ ts2_bo = create_and_check_bo(bufmgr[2], "ts2 bo");
+ ts3_bo = create_and_check_bo(bufmgr[3], "ts23 bo");
+
+ /* Put some non zero values in the delay bo */
+ {
+ uint32_t data=0xffffffff;
+ drm_intel_bo_subdata(delay_bo, 0, 4, &data);
+ drm_intel_bo_subdata(delay2_bo, 0, 4, &data);
+ }
+
+ calibrated_1s = igt_calibrate_delay_bb(fd[0], bufmgr[0], ringid);
+
+ /* Batch buffers to fill the in flight queue */
+ in_flight_bbs[0] = create_delay_bb(fd[0], bufmgr[0], ringid,
calibrated_1s, delay_bo);
+ in_flight_bbs[1] = create_delay_bb(fd[0], bufmgr[0], ringid,
calibrated_1s, delay2_bo);
+ for(loop = 2; loop < in_flight; loop++)
+ in_flight_bbs[loop] = create_noop_bb(fd[0], bufmgr[0], 5);
+
+ /* Extra batch buffers in the scheduler queue */
+ ts1_bb = create_timestamp_bb(fd[1], bufmgr[1], ringid, ts1_bo, NULL,
false);
+ ts2_bb = create_timestamp_bb(fd[2], bufmgr[2], ringid, ts2_bo, NULL,
false);
+ ts3_bb = create_timestamp_bb(fd[3], bufmgr[3], ringid, ts3_bo, NULL,
false);
+
+ /* Flush batchbuffers */
+ for(loop = 0; loop < in_flight; loop++)
+ intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(in_flight_bbs[loop], ringid);
+ intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(ts1_bb, ringid);
+ intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(ts2_bb, ringid);
+
+ /* This will not return until the bo has finished executing */
+ drm_intel_bo_map(delay_bo, 0);
+ /* Once the first delay is complete and any bumping has occured, submit
+ * the final batch buffer
+ */
+ intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(ts3_bb, ringid);
+
+ drm_intel_bo_map(delay2_bo, 0);
+ drm_intel_bo_map(ts1_bo, 0);
+ drm_intel_bo_map(ts2_bo, 0);
+ drm_intel_bo_map(ts3_bo, 0);
+
+ delay_buf = delay_bo->virtual;
+ delay2_buf = delay2_bo->virtual;
+ ts1_buf = ts1_bo->virtual;
+ ts2_buf = ts2_bo->virtual;
+ ts3_buf = ts3_bo->virtual;
+
+ igt_debug("Delay Timestamp = 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n", delay_buf[2]);
+ igt_debug("Delay Timestamp = 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n", delay2_buf[2]);
+ igt_debug("TS1 Timestamp = 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n", ts1_buf[0]);
+ igt_debug("TS2 Timestamp = 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n", ts2_buf[0]);
+ igt_debug("TS3 Timestamp = 0x%08" PRIx32 "\n", ts3_buf[0]);
+
+ /* buf[0] in the target buffer should be 0 if the batch buffer
completed */
+ igt_assert_f(delay_buf[0] == 0,
+ "delay_buf[0] expected 0x0, got 0x%" PRIx32 "\n",
delay_buf[0]);
+
+ igt_assert_f(igt_compare_timestamps(delay_buf[2], ts1_buf[0]),
+ "Delay ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ") > TS1 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ")\n",
+ delay_buf[2], ts1_buf[0]);
+
+ igt_assert_f(igt_compare_timestamps(ts2_buf[0], ts1_buf[0]),
+ "TS2 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ") > TS1 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ")\n",
+ ts2_buf[0], ts1_buf[0]);
+
+ igt_assert_f(igt_compare_timestamps(ts1_buf[0], ts3_buf[0]),
+ "TS1 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ") > TS3 ts (0x%08" PRIx32 ")\n",
+ ts1_buf[0], ts3_buf[0]);
+
+ /* Cleanup */
+ for(loop = 0; loop < in_flight; loop++)
+ intel_batchbuffer_free(in_flight_bbs[loop]);
+ intel_batchbuffer_free(ts1_bb);
+ intel_batchbuffer_free(ts2_bb);
+
+ drm_intel_bo_unreference(delay_bo);
+ drm_intel_bo_unreference(delay2_bo);
+ drm_intel_bo_unreference(ts1_bo);
+ drm_intel_bo_unreference(ts2_bo);
+ drm_intel_bo_unreference(ts3_bo);
+ for(loop = 0; loop < NBR_PRIO_BUMP_FDs; loop++) {
+ drm_intel_bufmgr_destroy(bufmgr[loop]);
+ close(fd[loop]);
+ }
+ free(in_flight_bbs);
+}
+
/* Dependency test.
* write=0, Submit batch buffers with read dependencies to all rings. Delay one
* with a long executing batch buffer. Check the others are not held up.
@@ -490,6 +618,12 @@ igt_main
run_test_dependency(in_flight, loop, true);
}
+ for (loop=0; loop < NBR_RINGS; loop++)
+ igt_subtest_f("%s-priority-bump", rings[loop].name) {
+ gem_require_ring(fd, rings[loop].id);
+ run_test_priority_bump(in_flight, rings[loop].id);
+ }
+
igt_fixture {
close(fd);
}
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
