On 10/03/2016 14:21, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
I think there is consesus to do this, but the question
is whether now is the time to do it?
If desired, needs to go in quickly before it goes stale.
But if not, it was an interesting exercise of learning
Coccinelle nevertheless.
Tvrtko Ursulin (5):
drm/i915: Rename local struct intel_engine_cs variables
drm/i915: Rename intel_engine_cs function parameters
drm/i915: Rename intel_engine_cs struct members
drm/i915: More intel_engine_cs renaming
drm/i915: More renaming of rings to engines
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c | 122 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 229 +++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 12 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 70 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 316 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 168 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_debug.c | 15 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 120 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 94 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_render_state.c | 12 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_render_state.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 158 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 37 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 243 ++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 6 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 114 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 12 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 826 ++++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h | 16 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_mocs.c | 6 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c | 60 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 38 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1425 +++++++++++++-------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 86 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 4 +-
25 files changed, 2132 insertions(+), 2059 deletions(-)
Are the filenames also going to be renamed?
regards
Arun
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
