On 04/21/2016 06:44 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> No one will just come out and just tell us the truth, so that users can quit
> wasting our time trying to make your Xen work. Your 4.2 kernel dumps core on
> i915, and Xen hangs on disk drive ID.
>
> Why don't you just take down the Xen half of this whole thing, and stop
> causing so many people the loss of so much time? It is very costly and
> frustrating for people to spend weeks to learn and customize a project to try
> and make it work, when it turns out that the underlying software is utterly
> broken. Not to mention embarrassing, when we have strongly advocated this
> approach to our bosses and clients, and it turns out to be snakebit.
>
> And on top of that you universally ignore questions on IRC and listserv,
> probably because you don't want to own up to the actual state of things?
> What do you people think you're doing all day? You can't, just do an
> occasional freeze and release a fairly stable point-release so that users can
> set up and learn about it? You just leave up a busted bunch of haywires, as
> if you're satisfying your company's requirements? I know, you're still
> getting paid no matter what.
>
> So let's just agree that doing both KVM -and- Xen, is too much for you.
> And/or that you've put the n00bs on Xen, who have nothing to lose.
>
> I implore that you be honest, and take this junk down to just concentrate on
> KVM. You can't do Xen; you clearly can't even do its drivers.
>
By "4.2 kernels" are you referring to the 2015q4 release of XenGT?
If so, please at least use the proper mail list:
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/igvt-g
intel-gfx is for "Intel graphics driver community testing & development",
not graphics virtualization.
--
Thanks,
Jike
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
