On 04/26/2016 10:11 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:25:00PM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
From: Robert Foss <[email protected]>
Add support for DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_LVDS and DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DSI
connectors.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <[email protected]>
---
tests/kms_panel_fitting.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c b/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
index 60a22b0..933776c 100644
--- a/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
+++ b/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
@@ -140,9 +140,15 @@ static void test_panel_fitting(data_t *d)
for_each_connected_output(display, output) {
drmModeModeInfo *mode, native_mode;
- if (output->config.connector->connector_type !=
- DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
- continue;
+ switch (output->config.connector->connector_type)
+ {
+ case DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_LVDS:
+ case DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP:
+ case DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DSI:
+ break;
+ default:
+ continue;
+ }
I think ville commented that we should instead check for "scaling mode",
and we discussed this on irc. Am I accidentally looking at an old patch
series?
-Daniel
No, this isn't an old patch, I misunderstood where our conversation ended.
"scaling mode" is an intel specific extension as far as I understand it,
which is somewhat the opposite of generalizing i-g-t tests.
Is there an architecture independent way forward?
pipe = output->config.pipe;
igt_output_set_pipe(output, pipe);
--
2.5.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
