Chris Wilson <[email protected]> writes: > [ text/plain ] > In order to reduce the workload of the caller, we do not want to > actually have to retire requests of others when checking the status of > this object. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 8 +------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > index 8439867..474c027 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > @@ -3069,14 +3069,8 @@ i915_gem_object_flush_active(struct > drm_i915_gem_object *obj) > if (req == NULL) > continue; > > - if (list_empty(&req->list)) > - goto retire; > - > - if (i915_gem_request_completed(req, true)) { > - __i915_gem_request_retire__upto(req); > -retire: > + if (i915_gem_request_completed(req, true)) > i915_gem_object_retire__read(obj, i); > - } > } > > return 0; > -- > 2.8.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
