basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank subtest sometimes fails asserting counted frames to
be aproximately equal with the estimated number.
This is a false negative, one of the reasons being the precision lost when
truncating a fractional number.
Fixed this by using floating point arithmetic.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Feceoru <gabriel.fece...@intel.com>
---
tests/kms_flip.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
index eda2fcc..6ec97d0 100644
--- a/tests/kms_flip.c
+++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
@@ -1182,13 +1182,13 @@ static void check_final_state(struct test_output *o,
struct event_state *es,
/* Verify we drop no frames, but only if it's not a TV encoder, since
* those use some funny fake timings behind userspace's back. */
if (o->flags & TEST_CHECK_TS && !analog_tv_connector(o)) {
- int expected;
+ double expected;
int count = es->count;
count *= o->seq_step;
- expected = elapsed / frame_time(o);
- igt_assert_f(count >= expected * 99/100 && count <= expected *
101/100,
- "dropped frames, expected %d, counted %d, encoder
type %d\n",
+ expected = (double)elapsed / frame_time(o);
+ igt_assert_f(fabs((double)count - expected)/expected <= 0.01,
+ "dropped frames, expected %f, counted %d, encoder
type %d\n",
expected, count, o->kencoder[0]->encoder_type);
}
}
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
