On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:10:07PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 27/05/16 12:58, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:50:34PM +0300, Marius Vlad wrote:
> >>Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.c.v...@intel.com>
> >
> >Nak. It's a race detector. Please suggest how to increase detection
> >rates.
> 
> As a more or less well know TV personality would say - "it's better than
> nothing"! :))
> 
> Seriously, under the new rules this is all we can do. Full gem-close-race
> will (will it?) run in the nightly run so a little bit more pain while
> bisecting breakages but those are the rules. We can give them a go and see
> how it works out.

Combinatorial tests (gem_concurrent_all/blit) and gem_evict_everything
are the only exceptions. We've been running nightly for over a week now.

You can have a look under /archive/results/Nightly/.

I'm not saying its perfect, but at least we have somewhere to start.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tvrtko
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to