On ke, 2016-07-27 at 19:11 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> From gen6, the hardware tracks address lookup failures and so that we do
> not trigger false positives from errors before we are initialised we
> clear those upon startup (intel_uncore_early_sanitize()). However, this
> is actually before we have the engines defined and this turns out to be
> a nop. The earliest we can do so is inside intel_engine_setup().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>

Documentation I found on this was poor, so I'd prefer a Tested-by: tag
from somebody (wide platform coverage). But codewise it's consistent
with existing usage.

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> index e28873cb0672..251e125a214f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ intel_engine_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>       engine->mmio_base = info->mmio_base;
>       engine->irq_shift = info->irq_shift;
>  
> +     if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6)
> +             I915_WRITE(RING_FAULT_REG(engine), 0);
> +
>       return engine;
>  }
>  
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to