From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

No need to iterate the rates array in intel_dp_max_link_rate(). We know
the max rate will be the last entry, and we already know the size.

Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.olive...@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.br...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Manasi D Navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgados...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index d1dd351682d2..40cae6202160 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
        if (WARN_ON(len <= 0))
                return 162000;
 
-       return rates[rate_to_index(0, rates) - 1];
+       return rates[len - 1];
 }
 
 int intel_dp_rate_select(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int rate)
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to