On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:31:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:56:04AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > It appears our calculation for the address of stolen memory is incorrect > > for 865G, so for the time being disable our use of that memory. > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96473 > > Fixes: 0ad98c74e093 ("drm/i915: Deatermine the stolen memory base > > address...") > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
There's a potentially better patch (one that actually fixes the stolen base calculation) attached to the bug. > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > > index e1791fe96674..8b501ddbc784 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > > @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static unsigned long i915_stolen_to_physical(struct > > drm_device *dev) > > * always at TOUD? Ie. is it always the last > > * one to be allocated by the BIOS? > > */ > > + if (0) /* https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96473 */ > > pci_bus_read_config_word(dev->pdev->bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), > > I865_TOUD, &toud); > > > > -- > > 2.8.1 > > > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
