On to, 2016-08-04 at 20:52 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> -i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
> +int i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
> intel_suspend_gt_powersave(dev_priv);
>
> @@ -4102,7 +4099,7 @@ i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
> if (ret)
> goto err;
>
> - ret = i915_gem_wait_for_idle(dev_priv);
> + ret = i915_gem_wait_for_idle(dev_priv, true);
> if (ret)
> goto err;
>
> @@ -4123,7 +4120,7 @@ i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
> return 0;
>
> err:
> - mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
Did you intend to convert the parameter to dev_priv?
> @@ -486,7 +486,8 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request
> *request,
> */
> request->emitted_jiffies = jiffies;
> request->previous_seqno = engine->last_submitted_seqno;
> - smp_store_mb(engine->last_submitted_seqno, request->fence.seqno);
> + engine->last_submitted_seqno = request->fence.seqno;
What's up with this change?
> + i915_gem_active_set(&engine->last_request, request);
> list_add_tail(&request->link, &engine->request_list);
> list_add_tail(&request->ring_link, &ring->request_list);
>
> <SNIP>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -6336,7 +6336,7 @@ bool i915_gpu_busy(void)
> dev_priv = i915_mch_dev;
>
> for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv)
> - ret |= !list_empty(&engine->request_list);
> + ret |= intel_engine_is_active(engine);
|= always makes me think of bitfields because, well -- it is bitwise
operation :P
if (intel_engine_is_active(engine))
ret = true;
But I can live with what it is.
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
