On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:24:12AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 04 Aug 2016, David Weinehall <david.weineh...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 04:09:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:18:15PM +0530, Kamble, Sagar A wrote: > >> > Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com > >> > <mailto:sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>> > >> > >> You're mailer wreaks havoc with your reviewed-by tags. Pleas fix this. > >> > >> > >> > On 6/27/2016 8:10 PM, akash.g...@intel.com wrote: > >> > > From: Akash Goel <akash.g...@intel.com> > >> > > > >> > > Updated the i915_drpc_info debugfs with coarse power gating & forcewake > >> > > info for Gen9. > >> > > > >> > > v2: Change all IS_GEN9() by gen >= 9 (Damien) > > > > For future reference, please use IS_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 for expressions > > such as this. My bad for not spotting this until the patch got merged. > > Fret not, however, I've got a few patches that'll clean this up :) > > David means INTEL_GEN(), not IS_GEN(). ;)
David indeed means INTEL_GEN(). Brainfart. :( Kind regards, David _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
