On ti, 2016-09-20 at 09:29 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > + /* Reserve a mappable slot for our lockless error capture */ > + ret = drm_mm_insert_node_in_range_generic(&ggtt->base.mm, > + &ggtt->gpu_error,
'error_page' would arguably be better name, or pretty much anything but 'gpu_error'. > @@ -2788,6 +2802,9 @@ void i915_ggtt_cleanup_hw(struct drm_i915_private > *dev_priv) > > i915_gem_cleanup_stolen(&dev_priv->drm); > > + if (drm_mm_node_allocated(&ggtt->gpu_error)) > + drm_mm_remove_node(&ggtt->gpu_error); > + Is there really a legit case of this being called twice? Or be called without the init? With the variable name fixed; Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
