> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf Of > Jesse Brandeburg > Sent: Monday, October 9, 2023 5:18 PM > To: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>; Jinjie Ruan > <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Eric > Dumazet <[email protected]>; Nguyen, Anthony L > <[email protected]>; Simon Horman <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; Keller, Jacob E <[email protected]>; Jakub > Kicinski <[email protected]>; Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>; David S. > Miller <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 1/2] igb: Fix an end of loop > test > > On 10/5/2023 6:57 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > When we exit a list_for_each_entry() without hitting a break > > statement, the list iterator isn't NULL, it just point to an offset > > off the list_head. In that situation, it wouldn't be too surprising > > for > > entry->free to be true and we end up corrupting memory. > > > > The way to test for these is to just set a flag. > > > > Fixes: c1fec890458a ("ethernet/intel: Use list_for_each_entry() > > helper") > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <[email protected]> > > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-wired-lan mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Intel-wired-lan mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
