On 2023/11/30 19:58, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > From: Yunsheng Lin <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:46:11 +0800 > >> On 2023/11/29 21:17, Alexander Lobakin wrote: >>> From: Yunsheng Lin <[email protected]> >>> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 11:17:50 +0800 >>> >>>> On 2023/11/27 22:32, Alexander Lobakin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Chris, any thoughts on a global flag for skipping DMA syncs ladder? >>>> >>>> It seems there was one already in the past: >>>> >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/T/ >>> >>> It addresses a different problem, meaningless indirect calls, while this >>> one addresses meaningless direct calls :> >>> When the above gets merged, we could combine these two into one global, >>> but Eric wasn't active with his patch and I remember there were some >>> problems, so I wouldn't count on that it will arrive soon. >> >> I went through the above patch, It seems to me that there was no >> fundamental problem that stopping us from implementing it in the dma >> layer basing on Eric' patch if Eric is no longer interested in working >> on a newer version? > > I'm somewhat interested in continuing working on Eric's patch, but not > now. Have some urgent projects to work on, I could take this in January > I guess... > This PP-specific shortcut was done earlier and gives good boosts. It > would be trivial to remove it together with the XSk shortcut once a > generic both indirect and direct call DMA shortcut lands. > Does this sounds good / justified enough? Or you and other > reviewers/maintainers would prefer to wait for the generic one without > taking this patch? >
I would prefer we could wait for the generic one as there is only about one month between now and january:) _______________________________________________ Intel-wired-lan mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
